Know what you have
A clear read on what your AI-built MVP really is. No more guessing what is under the hood.
We run 2 kinds of review: a deep code audit of your product, and technical due diligence for a deal or a board. Take one, or both as a single engagement. Either way, you get plain findings and a fix list in place of a wall of raw tool output.
The audit is for anyone who needs to trust a codebase they didn't write line by line. Here is who comes to us, and why.
A clear read on what your AI-built MVP really is. No more guessing what is under the hood.
A clean report to show investors. Technical questions stop being a weak spot.
A prioritized list, worst first. You spend the next sprint where it counts.
A realistic view of what to refactor and when. The roadmap matches reality.
Leo Kudryavtsev
Founder & Principal Solution Architect, Softrange TechnologyDaniel Bosch
Co-Founder, CampcruisersWhat really stood out was how flexible they were when our priorities changed. Whether we needed to shift focus or tackle something tricky, like the complex payment integration, they easily handled it. They kept communication clear and open, and their commitment to helping us meet both technical needs and business goals made a huge difference for us.
Dhaval Bhatt
Co-founder of SquiblerIncora has been fantastic to work with. I find them very professional, ethical, and, responsible. I’ve worked with many developers, but Team Incora has been outstanding. This team understands what you need and what you want, and delivers on both fronts very effectively. Highly recommend working with them if you get a chance…
Grover Righter
Grover Righter , Data Scientist & Founder of Lever10Now this was a great experience. The code was built on time. The end results are beautiful. The deployment went smoothly. We are ending this contract and starting another. Excellent professional tier mathematician. Successful project.
A code audit is an independent review of a codebase for quality, security, and maintainability, while technical due diligence assesses the full technical picture, including the code, team, and risk, usually for an investment or acquisition. The code audit is the deep technical core; due diligence wraps business risk around it.
In practice, our technical due diligence services include a full code audit plus a read on the team, processes, and scalability that a deal needs. A founder fixing a product usually wants the audit; an investor weighing a deal wants the wider review.
Both end the same way: a clear report, a prioritized list, and a cost to fix. You get an answer you can act on, whether you are shipping a product or signing a term sheet. The format is the same either way: findings, priorities, and cost.
Auditing AI-generated code focuses on the specific failure modes AI tools leave behind: missing permission checks, invented or copied logic, absent tests, and unvetted dependencies. A standard audit assumes a human wrote the code with intent, while AI code often looks correct and works in the demo yet hides gaps underneath.
Our technical due diligence consulting for AI-built products checks the code against how it was actually generated, rather than how a human would have written it. We focus most on the places AI tends to cut corners.
The result is an honest line between what genuinely works and what only appears to, so you ship on evidence rather than a confident-looking demo. That gap surprises most teams in production.
A code audit typically costs from about $5,000 for a focused review to $25,000 or more for a full due-diligence engagement, and most deliver in one to three weeks. Price and timeline scale with codebase size, the depth you need, and how fast you need the answer.
A single-app security review is quick and inexpensive; a full software due diligence review across several repositories for a deal takes longer. We scope it to your deadline and budget on the scoping call.
You get a fixed price and a delivery date before we start, so there are no surprises. Most clients have a report in hand within days of granting access. For a fast deal, we can prioritize the highest-risk areas first and follow with the full report.
Yes. We audit apps built with Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, and other AI coding tools, and this is a core part of what we do. These tools ship fast but leave predictable gaps, which is exactly what the audit is built to find.
Our code audit service reviews the generated code the same way we review any codebase, with extra attention to the shortcuts these tools tend to take. You get the same clear report regardless of which tool built the app.
Whether you have a prompt-built MVP or a larger product assembled with AI help, we tell you what is solid, what is risky, and what to fix before it reaches real users.
Got an idea in mind? Drop us a line and we’ll turn the vision into reality with the custom approach!